HR 899 This is a short bill. It would just abolish the U.S. Department of Education. No replacement, no explanation. The sponsors are: Massie, Amash, Biggs, Chaffetz, Gaetz, Hice, Jones, and Labrador. Draw your own conclusions.
Rep. King, R, IA filed H.R. 610, a bill which is a major assault on public education. The bill would repeal the Education and Secondary School Act of 1965. Instead, the U.S. DOE would award block grants to qualified states. States would then distribute block grants to local education agencies (districts) in a manner that apportions funds to families who elect to home school or send their children to private schools. In a word, it is a ‘voucher’ bill.
Curiously, the bill also revokes the nutrition standards for school breakfast and lunch programs.
Our public schools are the backbone of our democracy. This bill undermines an educational system that serves everyone, not just those that private schools chose to accept. This is just the beginning of an assault on public education. It is time to push back and keep pushing.
The Network for Public Education has an Action Alert to notify your representatives to oppose this bill. You can access their site here.
The telephone lines to D.C. were jammed with protest votes over the DeVos nomination for U.S. Secretary of Education. In Florida, Senator Rubio voted yes and Senator Nelson voted no. The U.S. Senate was tied and VP Pence broke the tie.
I saw a note about a one sentence bill to abolish the Department of Education. It was filed by Rep. Thomas Massie RKY. He thinks local parents and communities should control schools. He may be right.
By now most people who care realize that Betsy DeVos has one issue: parental choice. To achieve that end, she supports state control over education policy. In the New York Times analysis of her confirmation hearing, her knowledge of the law and education policy was non existent. This is not surprising. She has been a one horse pony in the private sector for vouchers and charter expansion.
The NY Times piece cites DeVos’ ignorance about special education law, regulation of for-profit universities, or even the difference between achievement gains and proficiency levels. The answer to every question was: leave it to the states. Will Congress bow out?
Suppose the federal government did close down the Department of Education. The federal government was not always involved in K12 education. Its history is interesting. Where would that lead? State after state is cutting funding. School districts and the private sector are supposed to find the money locally to manage the schools.
My grandmother taught in a country school. So did my husband’s mother. A few people got together, built a one room school and hired a teacher. Will this approach raise our PISA scores? It reminds me of an old time saying: Watch out what you wish for.
In a news report on President Obama’s legacy, one commentator stated that is focus on eliminating failing schools would survive. These are the ‘turn around’ schools where most students do not meet state proficiency levels. Some say that the goal to have all students be proficient is like assuming all students must be ‘above average’. Proficiency standards, however, are set at levels most but not all students are expected to reach. The expectations are an ever increasing target. As achievement goes up, standards go up.
It is a trap, however, to excuse low performance because students have not been expected or even required to do better. Is there an escape hatch?
Senate President Joe Negron has announced his Education Committee members. They appear to share a broader spectrum of interests than those in the Florida House. The Senate Education Committee Chair will be Sen. Dorothy Hukill, a Republican from Volusia County. Volusia supports public schools and has relatively few charter schools.
For those of you who are concerned about the role of billionaire philanthropists in education, you have a bigger worry. Betsy DeVos has been an avid advocate for private school vouchers. DeVos is from Michigan, a state with rampant charter school scandals. She was also chairwoman of Alliance for School Choice and the All Schools Matter PAC as well as a board member of a number of other education organizations. She points to Florida as her biggest success with the American Federation for Children which supported the corporate tax credit scholarship program. Her ties to Florida also include Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education where she is a board member.
Some people grow into a job, but DeVos’ past is likely to be her prologue. She had experience with a private school where parents were working hard to help their children succeed. From that beginning, she evidently generalized that private schools were better than public ones. Parents who chose to leave public schools, one assumes, will try harder to help their children succeed. The end result is increased segregation, less choice and little accountability.
I have avoided posting all of the speculation about possible changes in education leadership and policy in the new administration. It is just plain hard on my peace of mind, especially when most of it will not happen. I firmly believe that the real changes will be through the change in leadership in the Florida legislature. As you know, I am not sanguine on those. You can see previous posts.
This morning, however, I ran across an article that helps us think more realistically about what change at the federal level would take. This Ed Week article reviews legislation that would have to be amended to redirect funding. It also points toward a likely push for school choice funding in the Congress. It is worth a read.
Are we putting huge pressure on kids not only to ‘get to grade level’ but also to be ‘gifted’ or ‘highly gifted’? Do all children feel like they have a FSA proficiency level painted on their T-shirts? This is an age old issue of grouping and tracking vs. diverse ability classrooms where children have different strengths and weaknesses regardless of “I.Q.” as measured by a test?
The FSBA wants more evidence than a single test score to determine student achievement. Fair enough, but there is more to think about! In a newly adopted platform, the FSBA calls for three revisions to current practice in retaining third graders:
A five year study (2011-2016) of federal startup charters in Florida, conducted by the Collaborative Assessment and Program Evaluation Services (CAPES) at the University of Florida, makes one wonder why Florida was given so much more federal money this year to launch new charter schools.
It may be a bitter pill for the federal government to swallow, but this study reinforces the NAACP’s decision to call for a moratorium on the expansion of charters.