Rep. David Simmons, the chair of the Florida Senate Appropriations sub committee on Education wants a serious look at way to reduce over testing. What is over testing? Is it all the prep testing that goes on prior to the state tests? On the other hand, is it too many redundant state or national tests e.g. requiring students to sit the FSA and the SAT if they are going to college? Or, is it requiring students to take a state test like the FSA every year? There is another way to look at over testing. Perhaps it is a way to avoid looking for solutions.
Can you imagine that the Florida House and Senate would support the repeal of the Fair Districting amendments, making the redistricting process secret, as well as rescinding constitutional bans on state support for private, religious schools? The Miami Herald reports that these are the major goals of the legislative leaders. Florida’s constitution would have to be changed, and the process is now in place. We need to know about this; it is real.
The Tampa Bay Times reported that a bi-partisan panel of legislators voiced support for teacher pay raises and less testing in schools. Even more surprising was the opinion that all there should be more equity in school accountability for public schools, charter schools and private schools. This has been a major issue in the League of Women Voters arguments that all schools that receive state funding directly or indirectly through tax credit vouchers should meet the same testing and accountability standards.
Who is supporting public schools? Is there a war brewing?
The Tampa Bay Times says yes, indeed there is evil afoot in Tallahassee. Daniel Ruth calls on his creative writing skills to explain incoming House Speaker Richard Corcoran’s comment that the Florida Education Association (and I suppose the League) is evil for opposing Florida tax credit vouchers for private schools. He calls Corcoran ‘a cunning chap’ for running on a platform emphasizing the need for civility and responsible government. Maybe Corcoran just meant for other people, not himself. Corcoran’s message is anything but civil or responsible.
Ruth says, “Alas, this is Tallahassee where sober judgment goes to die.”
He continues with a quote from Corcoran about a group of professional educators who were trying to protect funding for public schools and opposed Corcoran’s plan to slash the education budget.
Corcoran referred to the educators as ‘the ISIS of the three Rs’.
This is not the rhetoric that leads to constructive approaches to improve student learning. In fact, Corcoran has no apparent interest in negotiating with anyone including fellow Republican Senate President Joe Negron. He was quoted in the Miami Herald : “We are going to govern unabashedly principled and unabashedly conservative….That creates tensions, that creates internal strife.”
Put on your armor; you will need it.
The 2015 Florida legislature tied charter capital outlay funds to their academic success. Charters have privately owned school facilities paid for from public funds. The new rules would disallow facility funding not only for charters that have consecutive failing grades but also for those with consecutive ‘D’ school grades. The rule affects thirteen charters with consecutive ‘D’ grades. Charter owners are protesting. An administrative judge has agreed with them, and they will get their money. How much? $408,500 since school began this fall. Multiply it out and it would be over a million and a half dollars per year for 13 schools.
Let’s think about this. Charters located in low income areas are given more facility money. Public schools facility funding located in the same areas has steadily declined for years. If the State shifts money from publically owned schools to privately owned failing charters, who wins? Not the children.
Suppose a charter operating in the same neighborhood has a higher school grade than the local public school. Is the charter doing a better job? Or, do they enroll fewer children with learning disabilities? Do they dismiss children who do not ‘fit their school norms’. Do they draw the children from families at a higher income level? It is no secret that if you want a higher performing school, select higher performing students to begin with. This is a process called ‘creaming’. These schools do not make students better, the students make the schools better.
What does make students better? more time in school, tutors, support services, and good teachers and principals
Giving charters rent money is a much cheaper way to go. The problem is that nothing changes for most kids who need a place to go. School choice just moves children around; they go in circles leading nowhere. We could fix this.
We can continue to feed information to the public about the destructive impact of ill thought out school choice policies. There is a danger, however, that we are simply preaching to the choir. Those who should be aware may not be tuned in.
Our strategies to increase awareness must be more diverse. What would prompt your neighbor, colleague, fellow parent to tune in?
It is logical that busy people preoccupied with families and jobs will respond to calls for action if they recognize the urgency and the possibility for a positive impact.
I am working on a set of ‘headlines’ and slogans that communicate the immediacy of the need to preserve our public schools. What do we value about our public schools? What are the threats to public education? Which solutions do we propose?
Can we come up with short, single sentences that encapsulate a need or something you value. Then we can refer people to more in depth analyses and ways to respond.
- Vouchers segregate, not integrate schools.
- Vouches for the poor pay for poor quality schools.
- Vouchers help the rich get richer.
- Private schools get public money with no strings attached.
- Public schools innovate, charters stagnate.
- Public schools invite students in; charters counsel them out.
- Charters profit from students; public schools invest in them.
- When housing patterns limit access to quality education, fix it!
- School choice means all schools are under funded.
- Teaching, not testing helps students learn.
- We need more time, not more testing.
- School choice is a distraction not an option to improve learning.
You get the idea. Send me your captions and communication strategies. We will hone them and use them to target issues. We will discuss these at the League’s Orlando leadership conference in January.
North Carolina has just elected a new governor; will it mean a better direction for public schools? In this article, Jeff Bryant from Alter Net takes on the scramble for cash to fund public schools. A shortage of funding is only part of the puzzle. The impact of charters on the efficiency of funding for schools is looming large. The open enrollment policies states are enacting cause a financial planning crisis for public schools. Not only is it difficult to estimate how many students may shift from one school to another within a district, students now are moving across district lines to charters. Districts have to send tax dollars to charters whose students may come from somewhere else.
The issue gets more complicated as charters managed by out of state private companies grows. Many of these are for-profit companies seeking to expand into lucrative markets. Making money is important to these folks. Bryant cites work done by Pat Hall and Sue Legg of the Florida League of Women Voters to explain were the profits come from. Think real estate. Then Bryant goes on to summarize work by University of North Carolina law professor Tom Kelley who questions the legal and tax implications of these practices.
It is time that we the people take notice. As my colleague Pat Drago says, ‘School Choice is a diversion, not a solution.’
It is worth reading to see how an insidious resegregation of schools has evolved. Of course, charter schools are part of the problem. Things came to a head when a proposal for a new charter was presented to the school board. Board member Andy Griffith erupted and asked: How do we know this is not just another white flight school?
Charters are not the only way to resegregate schools. Read about the:
- School bus route trick
- Charter school trick
- Student tracking trick
- No black teachers trick
The journalists ask if there is not a better way. What is happening to schools in this community is not good.
Senate President Joe Negron has announced his Education Committee members. They appear to share a broader spectrum of interests than those in the Florida House. The Senate Education Committee Chair will be Sen. Dorothy Hukill, a Republican from Volusia County. Volusia supports public schools and has relatively few charter schools.
For those of you who are concerned about the role of billionaire philanthropists in education, you have a bigger worry. Betsy DeVos has been an avid advocate for private school vouchers. DeVos is from Michigan, a state with rampant charter school scandals. She was also chairwoman of Alliance for School Choice and the All Schools Matter PAC as well as a board member of a number of other education organizations. She points to Florida as her biggest success with the American Federation for Children which supported the corporate tax credit scholarship program. Her ties to Florida also include Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education where she is a board member.
Some people grow into a job, but DeVos’ past is likely to be her prologue. She had experience with a private school where parents were working hard to help their children succeed. From that beginning, she evidently generalized that private schools were better than public ones. Parents who chose to leave public schools, one assumes, will try harder to help their children succeed. The end result is increased segregation, less choice and little accountability.