Recent Posts
Click to View and Comment
Education Issues Blog
To Educate and Inform on Issues Relating to Public Education
Introduction
Our blog is a tool box. Make it work for you. Here you will find data, studies, and perspectives that inform the discussion about school choice. Send stories of events in your state. Tell us about studies that clarify issues. Do your own studies. Use the information you find here to advocate for League positions.
CONTACT us by email to send posts.
COMMENT by pressing the ‘Continue Reading’ button and scroll to the space provided.
CLICK THE PICTURES on the banner to see the FEATURE STORY. LEGISLATION, and LAWSUITS.
VISIT THE COMMITTEES. You will see the latest on national school reform issues. Learn about school and teacher ACCOUNTABILITY, CURRICULUM, LAWS, MANAGEMENT, FACILITY issues, and VOUCHER concerns. We will post questions of the week about the hot topics. Participate through our contact icon.
STUDY THE RESOURCES. Here you will find sources of information. They will grow with your help. Use the Search bar to locate categories of resources. Write articles and make fact sheets for your own groups. Send what you create to share with others.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE BLOG TO RECEIVE EMAIL NOTICES OF NEW POSTS.
New:
Catch up on Florida Tax Credit Vouchers
Much of what has been happening with these tax credit vouchers has been under the radar. I took a peek, and here is what has happened lately. The cost keeps going up, but are corporations getting fed up?
Changes in the FTC program funding are reflected in the automatic increase in the cap for corporate donations, the expansion in eligible funding sources, changes in family income eligibility guidelines, and the increase in percentage of the per student allocations for public schools allowed for private school scholarships.
Most years, excluding 2016-17, the Florida Tax Credit scholarship program saw a 10,000 student increase in participation. In 2016, the enrollment doubled from the previous year due to legislative changes in eligibility. In 2018-19, however, enrollment dropped by 10,000 due to a decline in corporate donations.
• In 2016-17, the income qualifications based on a family of four were raised to 185% -260% of poverty level or from about $44,123 to approximately $62,000 per year. The proportional amount of the full scholarships are reduced for middle income families.
• FTC scholarships are funded from corporate tax rebates up to a designated funding cap. The program funding sources were expanded to include credits against insurance premium tax for contributions to eligible non-profit SFOs, severance taxes on oil and gas production, sales tax liabilities of direct pay permit holders, and alcoholic beverages taxes.
• There is a 25% automatic increase in the cap as long as enrollment exceeds 90% of the cap.
• The amount of the scholarship was originally set at 72% of the FEFP per student funding for public schools, but an automatic increase was provided up to 82% of FEFP in 2016-17. In 2017, the FEFP percentage was again increased from 82%, depending upon grade level, to 88-96%. The maximum award in 2017-18 was $5,886. Step Up has reported a 10,000 student decrease in 2018-19 FTC enrollment due to a decline in corporate donations.
• In 2017-18, Step Up distributed $689 million of the dollars to 108,000 students in over 1700 private, mostly religious schools. These donations were about 10% below the allowable cap. This year, corporate pledges are $687 million. The largest corporate donors to the FTC scholarships are the beverage industry and United Health Care.
• Tax Credit Scholarship Expansion. Given the projected decrease in corporate funding, the legislature turned to donations from sales taxes for new cars to expand the FTC program. These are called Hope Scholarships and were implemented in 2018-19. The maximum scholarship award for a student ranges from $6519 to $7111 for those whose family income is no more than double the federal poverty level. There were 66 participating students in fall of 2018.
References.
http://www.fldoe.org/schools/school-choice/k-12-scholarship-programs/ftc/ftc-faqs.stml
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2017/1314/Analyses/
2017s01314.pre.ed.PDF
https://www.tampabay.com/article/20180815/ARTICLE/308159799
https://www.stepupforstudents.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/14-fsba-issue-brief-on-ftc.pdf
Florida Supreme Court Rules Against Public Schools
My take on Friday’s Supreme Court decision on the Citizens for Strong Schools lawsuit.
Article IX of Florida’s constitution, ratified voters in 1998, called for the state to make adequate provision for the education of all children to have a uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality system of free public schools…. In 2009, the Citizens for Strong Schools lawsuit began its arduous journey to the Florida Supreme Court. The plaintiffs had argued that Florida’s choice system failed its constitutional mandate. In one example, the plaintiffs cited data showing “one million Florida minority students (1/2 of all students), moreover, do not read at grade level”.
The defense defined educational quality as ‘continuous progress’. Thus, in the state’s view, if test scores go up, the system is working. NAEP was the standard used to show improvement. There has been improvement in Florida’s NAEP scores over the past twenty years. The state claimed that the improvement in achievement was attributed to the quality of teachers and administrators and the pressure from school choice. The plaintiffs argued that improvement is fine, but the achievement is still low. Moreover, a high quality system gives access to all children, not just some.
At its core, the lawsuit was about adequate funding to meet children’s needs. If the plaintiffs had won the lawsuit, they would have asked for a cost study so that requirements would be aligned with resources. In the current choice system, funding to support charter and private schools drains needed resources from public schools. Florida’s per student funding is one of the lowest in the nation.
In January 2019, the Court in a contentious 4/3 split decision, rejected the claims of the plaintiff. The majority opinion of the court was that the terms ‘high quality’ and ‘efficient’ are ambiguous and do not create judiciable standards. Education policy and funding are in the domain of the legislature, not the judicial system. Chief Justice Canady said: the plaintiffs “failed to provide any manageable standard by which to avoid judicial intrusion into other branches of government”. The minority opinions stated that the majority opinion “eviscerates the 1998 opinion…only time will truly reveal the depth of the injury inflicted upon Florida’s children”.
What is the correct basis for the legal argument? is it a rational basis or must the state comply with specific requirements to provide a high quality education? A Wikipedia explanation stated that it is easier to define a rational basis by what it is not. It is not a genuine effort…to inquire whether a statute does in fact further a legitimate end of government. I found a quote attributed to Thurgood Marshall…the constitution does not prohibit legislatures from enacting stupid laws. The case may have hinged on the interpretation of the legal basis of the case. It reminds me of a saying I have heard often: Is it close enough for government work or do we have to get it right?
Where do Florida citizens go next to garner support for the education of their children?
Supreme Court Rules Against Citizens for Strong Schools
Chief Justice Canady ruled that the ten year long lawsuit brought by the Citizens for Strong Schools is over. Canady declared in his opinion that the legislature, not the judiciary, is responsible for education policy and funding. In a 4/3 divided opinion, the quality of Florida’s education system is now in the voters’ hands. If changes in the funding and school choice policies are to be made, the voters must send people who favor those changes to Tallahassee.
And Yet Another Scandal
The attorney for Florida’s online K12 school resigned after 18 years. Now, it is clear why. Frank Druppenbacher has been accused of using FVS employees for his own private businesses. He also has a problem speaking in a respectful way to women..’boorish and gender based comments’ are the words used to describe his behavior.
Warning: Array to string conversion in /home/lwveducation/public_html/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 1096
JavaScript
Categories
Previous Posts
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Categories
- Achievement (320)
- Admission/Dismissal (68)
- Advocacy (108)
- Alabama (2)
- Arizona (3)
- Audits (30)
- Authorization (79)
- blended learning (3)
- Books (6)
- California (25)
- career educatopm (4)
- Careers (1)
- Charter School Management (365)
- Charter Schools (434)
- Chicago (4)
- Civil Rights (119)
- Colorado (10)
- Common Core Standards (27)
- Connecticut (5)
- Constitutionality (63)
- Curriculum (60)
- Delaware (1)
- Department of Education (90)
- Disability (37)
- discipline (36)
- Early Childhood Education (58)
- Education Committee (16)
- ESOL (6)
- ESSA (20)
- Facilities (167)
- FBI (4)
- Florida (730)
- Florida House (129)
- Florida Senate (118)
- Funding (424)
- Georgia (7)
- Hawaii (2)
- Illinois (7)
- Indiana (9)
- Innovation (33)
- International (2)
- Kansas (1)
- Kentucky (4)
- Lawsuits (106)
- League Positions (26)
- Legislation (196)
- Louisiana (12)
- Maine (2)
- Massachusetts (8)
- Michigan (19)
- Minnesota (13)
- Mississippi (4)
- Missouri (2)
- Nevada (3)
- New Hampshire (4)
- New Jersey (10)
- New Mexico (20)
- New York (28)
- Newark (4)
- No Child Left Behind (7)
- North Carolina (12)
- Ohio (23)
- Oklahoma (6)
- Online Education (20)
- Pennsylvania (10)
- Public Education (428)
- Questions (14)
- Reform (155)
- Religion (50)
- Research studies (57)
- Resegregation (60)
- Rhode Island (3)
- State and Local government (23)
- Tax credit scholarships (142)
- Teachers (109)
- Tennessee (15)
- Testing (161)
- Texas (10)
- turnaround (6)
- Uncategorized (182)
- US Government (74)
- Utah (2)
- Vouchers (74)
- Washington D.C. (16)
- Washington State (6)
- Wisconsin (5)
Resources
- February 2025
- December 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- March 2023
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014










Pingback: Newly Surfaced Video of Moms for Liberty Advisor Reveals Religious Extremist Agenda - Bucks County Beacon